The first film I saw was named, About A Girl. It won a BAFTA award in the year 2001 and was directed by Brian Percival with a length of nine minutes and fifty-two seconds.
Negotiated Hegemonic - The difference in audience views can also lead to a variety of questions needing to be confirmed about the film in order to understand the true moral of the story. The main audience will have a different understanding than those of the producers so will have to adapt to the original meaning.
Oppositional Hegemonic - The message in this film can be interpreted in many ways. Audiences will most likely blame the mother for neglecting her child even though the preferred meaning of the film is to put the blame on the girl as she stays too secretive. The younger age race can relate to such stories possible from personal experience increasing its popularity.
Dominant Hegemonic - About A Girl brings amazement to the audience as the ending to the story is set to do. No one prepares for it bringing an entire new feeling to the film however it brings understanding to the films perception. It also brings in confusion leading to many questions to why the events had happened e.t.c.
Moral Panic - About A Girl threatens the social impact of female teenagers. This pressures feelings of being selfish and under-educated towards similar people causing a wider controversial stereotype enforcing more questions to be asked in relation to this short film.
Profile the Target Audience: The film has won many awards including Best Short Film Winner 2001 in the BAFTA's and Edinburgh International Film Festival 2001. This clearly indicates that a lot of work had been done into its research for it to become such a success. The BAFTA's Best Short Film Award was set up in order to encourage the essential growth and development of new talent within the British film industry in which the producers of this film have benefited from majorly.
Viewing Environment - Short films are shown mostly at film festivals; this is where they gain their popularity. The audience here are more convenient for them as they are focused only on the film rather than any other disturbances you would get at home for example. However the disadvantage to this is that there is only a limited audience, this is because short films aren’t really advertised therefore the majority of times, it is usually the same type of audience rather than a different variety.
Film four also air short films on their channel although as they already have a specific target market however it does help to increase its popularity even though it would not be as much as other channels, for example, BBC1.
You can also argue that audiences to both Film Four and Film Festivals are both the same. This is because they both have a set target market and stick to that, also because the audience are mainly focused on the film, therefore cannot find any disturbances to distract them and under-rate the film.
The second film I saw was named Cubs. It was directed by Tom Harper and produced by Lisa Williams, with a length of nine minutes and forty-nine seconds.
I noticed a dominant hegemonic representation behind this film as the story line behind the film is quite clear making the audience easily understand the preferred meaning offered by the text. It shows a youngster wanting to join a crew of older teenagers; however it comes at a price which by many audiences would be seen as horrific. This is easily understood by the audience as there have been similar story lines in popular TV shows, giving a stereotype for such people.
The film shows a youngster wanting to join a crew of older people which they say can become possible only if he shoots dead a fox. The audience can easily view his hesitations and unwillingness nevertheless his desire to link with the crew comes to a bigger value to him. This shows how some people can be peer-pressured into things they are reluctant to do in certain areas increasing negative stereotypes for many.
Due to the depth of the events in the film, it would increase stereotypes for such people. Many would now think that this occurs on a regular, common basis, giving a false hype towards teenagers.
Daniel Stedman shows a stereotypical role of a mother towards her child; caring and loving, however through character movement rather than dialogue making it harder to understand in some ways. Although due to the chosen character movements, it is easier to understand what Steadman is implying, such as the mum smiling and applauding her child showing her parental love, a well known stereotype.
However, when the boy reveals his sexuality it brings a complete shock to the audience leading to a different view of the film. Apart from this, the film comes across as a dominant hegemonic as its preferred meaning by the producers is easily understood by the audience.
No comments:
Post a Comment